Insight / Teaching Analytics
πŸ“ˆ Teaching Analytics

Teaching Analytics

An executive view of teaching quality across the building β€” observation trends, teacher growth, professional-learning participation, instructional strengths, student engagement, curriculum implementation, and coaching effectiveness. Use these dashboards to spot patterns, target support, and tell the story of instructional improvement.

Teaching-quality indicators

Walkthroughs completed (term)
0
β–² 18% vs. prior term
Teachers in active coaching
0
β–² 6 new this cycle
Avg. instructional-quality rating
0
β–¬ Holding steady
PL participation rate
0
β–² 9 pts year over year

Engagement & implementation health

0%Student engagement index

Observed active participation across sampled lessons.

0%Curriculum implementation

Fidelity to the adopted scope & sequence.

Instructional strengths by domain

Aggregate observation evidence, scored as a percentage of look-fors consistently present.

🎯 Clarity of learning targets88%
πŸ’¬ Academic discourse71%
🧩 Checks for understanding76%
πŸ“ Cognitive rigor / DOK64%
🀝 Classroom culture & routines91%
πŸ” Feedback to students59%

Areas for improvement

Domains with the lowest consistency are the building's highest-leverage focus areas. Expand for context.

β–ΈπŸ” Feedback to students β€” 59%Priority

Feedback is often evaluative rather than actionable. Coaching focus: timely, specific, student-actionable feedback tied to success criteria.

β–ΈπŸ“ Cognitive rigor / DOK β€” 64%Watch

Tasks skew toward recall. PL focus: planning DOK 3–4 tasks and questions across content areas.

β–ΈπŸ’¬ Academic discourse β€” 71%Watch

Discourse is uneven across classrooms. Lesson-study focus: structured talk routines and accountable-talk stems.

Observation trend

Average instructional-quality score across monthly observation cycles (illustrative).

Sep β†’ May Β· 9 cycles Β· steady upward trend in observed quality.

Professional-learning participation

Teachers participating per PL strand this year (illustrative counts).

Coaching effectiveness

Growth measured as change in target look-fors from baseline to end-of-cycle observation.

Coaching cohorts this year β€” illustrative.
CohortCyclesGrowthStatus
Early-career (Yr 1–2)4+22%On track
Discourse focus3+15%On track
Rigor / DOK focus3+8%Monitor
Feedback focus2+4%Needs support
Veteran refinement4+11%On track

All figures on this page are illustrative sample data for portfolio demonstration β€” not records from any school.

Research Foundation

Analytics are framed by Visible Learning, instructional-coaching research, and data-informed improvement cycles β€” turning observation evidence into targeted, equitable support rather than ranking. All scenarios and figures are illustrative.