Teaching Analytics
An executive view of teaching quality across the building β observation trends, teacher growth, professional-learning participation, instructional strengths, student engagement, curriculum implementation, and coaching effectiveness. Use these dashboards to spot patterns, target support, and tell the story of instructional improvement.
Teaching-quality indicators
Engagement & implementation health
Observed active participation across sampled lessons.
Fidelity to the adopted scope & sequence.
Instructional strengths by domain
Aggregate observation evidence, scored as a percentage of look-fors consistently present.
Areas for improvement
Domains with the lowest consistency are the building's highest-leverage focus areas. Expand for context.
Feedback is often evaluative rather than actionable. Coaching focus: timely, specific, student-actionable feedback tied to success criteria.
Tasks skew toward recall. PL focus: planning DOK 3β4 tasks and questions across content areas.
Discourse is uneven across classrooms. Lesson-study focus: structured talk routines and accountable-talk stems.
Observation trend
Average instructional-quality score across monthly observation cycles (illustrative).
Sep β May Β· 9 cycles Β· steady upward trend in observed quality.
Professional-learning participation
Teachers participating per PL strand this year (illustrative counts).
Coaching effectiveness
Growth measured as change in target look-fors from baseline to end-of-cycle observation.
| Cohort | Cycles | Growth | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early-career (Yr 1β2) | 4 | +22% | On track |
| Discourse focus | 3 | +15% | On track |
| Rigor / DOK focus | 3 | +8% | Monitor |
| Feedback focus | 2 | +4% | Needs support |
| Veteran refinement | 4 | +11% | On track |
All figures on this page are illustrative sample data for portfolio demonstration β not records from any school.
Analytics are framed by Visible Learning, instructional-coaching research, and data-informed improvement cycles β turning observation evidence into targeted, equitable support rather than ranking. All scenarios and figures are illustrative.