Overview / Student Risk Dashboard
๐Ÿšฆ Early-Warning Analytics

Student Risk Dashboard

A real-time view of student risk across the school: how risk is distributed, where it is concentrated, how it is moving over time, and which students need attention now. All figures are fictional sample data for demonstration.

Low Risk
0
83% ยท โ–ฒ 3%
Medium Risk
0
11% ยท steady
High Risk
0
6% ยท โ–ฒ 1% โ€” watch
Meet 2+ Indicators
0
12 high-priority

Risk Distribution

0%On track

Low 83% ยท Medium 11% ยท High 6%

Risk Over Time

Medium+high risk drifting up โ€” driven by Grade 8.

Emerging Trends

  • Grade 8 attendance (Mon/Fri)
  • Math course failure rising
  • Assignment completion โ–ผ
  • Behavior incidents โ–ผ

โœจ AI Risk Summary Simulated

Of 497 students, 83% are low risk, 11% medium, and 6% high. Risk is concentrated in Grade 8, where the strongest contributing indicators are attendance (clustered Mon/Fri) and math performance. 47 students meet two or more early-warning indicators and 12 are high-priority; notably, several show recent downward trends rather than chronic low performance โ€” a key window to intervene. Recommended next step: open coordinated Tier 2 plans for the highest-risk cohort and launch a tiered attendance response. Open the AI Risk Engine for student-level analysis โ†’

Risk by Grade โ€” % medium or high

Grade 612%
Grade 715%
Grade 828%
Grade 918%
Grade 1014%
Grade 119%

Risk by Class โ€” flagged students

Math 8 ยท Pd 311
Science 8 ยท Pd 29
ELA 8 ยท Pd 56
Math 7 ยท Pd 15
Social St 9 ยท Pd 44

Risk by Subgroup

Reviewed for equity. Subgroups are reported only where group size is large enough to protect privacy. Fictional sample data.

Share of students at medium or high risk, by reporting subgroup (illustrative).
SubgroupStudentsMedium+High RiskTrendStatus
All students49717%โ–ฒ 1% Watch
Multilingual learners8623%โ–ฒ 2% Watch
Students with IEPs7126%flat Watch
Economically disadvantaged20821%โ–ฒ 1% Watch
New to school (<1 yr)5419%โ–ผ 2% Improving

Risk Heatmap โ€” grade ร— early-warning indicator

Darker cells indicate a higher share of students flagged on that indicator. Fictional sample data.

Attendance
Academics
Behavior
Engagement
Grade 6
7
9
4
8
Grade 7
12
10
6
11
Grade 8
21
18
9
16
Grade 9
13
12
7
8
Grade 10
9
8
3
6
Very low Low Moderate Elevated High

Risk Cohorts โ€” click to expand

โ–ธMeet all 3 indicators ยท 4 studentsHigh

All four are Grade 8, flagged on attendance, course performance, and engagement. None has an active coordinated plan. Recommended: convene the support team this week and assign a case-manager per student.

โ–ธAttendance + academics ยท 19 studentsMedium

Chronic or emerging absenteeism combined with falling grades. Recommended: Tier 2 attendance check-ins plus targeted small-group reteach in the affected subject.

โ–ธRecent downward trend (no chronic flag) ยท 24 studentsEmerging

Stable-to-strong history with a sharp 3โ€“4 week decline. High-value window: light-touch outreach and progress monitoring often prevents escalation.

โ–ธSingle-indicator watchlist ยท 31 studentsMonitor

One indicator flagged. Continue universal Tier 1 supports and re-check in 3 weeks before escalating.

Flagged Students โ€” highest priority this week

Student A โ€” Grade 8High
  • Attendance 81% (chronic, Mon/Fri)
  • Failing Math & Science
View success profile โ†’
Student B โ€” Grade 8High
  • 3 behavior referrals this month
  • Assignment completion 49% (โ–ผ)
View success profile โ†’
Student C โ€” Grade 7Medium
  • Attendance 88% (emerging)
  • Math grade dropped one letter
View success profile โ†’
Student D โ€” Grade 9Medium
  • 2 disengagement flags
  • Belonging "amber" on last check-in
View success profile โ†’

Student names are fictional placeholders for demonstration only.

All data shown is realistic fictional sample data created for demonstration.