Intervention Planner
A single workspace for the intervention lifecycle: build a plan with clear goals and review dates, track active interventions and implementation fidelity, monitor progress toward goal attainment, manage the case timeline, and read an AI progress summary with recommended adjustments. All data shown is realistic fictional sample data.
🧩 Build an intervention plan — demonstration form
Demonstration only — inputs are presentational. Tier and intensity follow MTSS team review; the least-intensive effective support is selected first.
📋 Active interventions — illustrative sample
| Student | Area | Strategy | Tier | Fidelity | Next review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Student A · Gr 8 | Attendance | Mentor check-in (CICO) | Tier 2 | 94% | Aug 10 |
| Student A · Gr 8 | Mathematics | Small-group reteach 3×/wk | Tier 2 | 78% | Aug 12 |
| Student B · Gr 7 | Reading / ELA | Fluency + comprehension group | Tier 2 | 91% | Aug 15 |
| Student C · Gr 8 | Behavior | Self-monitoring & CICO | Tier 3 | 62% | Aug 08 |
| Student D · Gr 6 | Well-being | SEL skills group | Tier 2 | 88% | Aug 18 |
| Student E · Gr 8 | Executive function | Organization coaching | Tier 2 | 74% | Aug 11 |
Fidelity = how consistently the plan is being delivered as designed. Low fidelity is reviewed before judging whether a strategy is working.
🎯 Goal attainment
Progress toward each intervention goal (illustrative).
📈 Progress trend
Attendance over the last 7 progress checks (illustrative).
Attendance up 4 points over 3 weeks — plan is on track; continue and review at the next MTSS meeting.
🗂️ Case management — Student A · Grade 8 — illustrative case log
- Jun 02
Referral & screening
Flagged by early-warning indicators (attendance + math). Case-manager assigned: Ms. Rivera.
- Jun 09
MTSS team meeting
Opened Tier 2 plan: mentor check-in + math small-group reteach. Goals and review dates set.
- Jun 16
Family outreach
Positive call home; family partnership plan agreed for Mon/Fri attendance.
- Jun 23 — now
Progress review
Attendance ▲4 pts; math fidelity at 78% — note to increase consistency before changing strategy.
- Jun 30 — next step
6-week decision point
Team to continue, adjust, or change tier based on progress-monitoring evidence.
✨ AI Progress Summaries & Recommended Adjustments Simulated
Student A is responding: attendance is up 4 points and ELA fluency is near target. Math progress lags (71% of goal) — but implementation fidelity sits at 78%, so the recommendation is to increase consistency before changing the strategy. Behavior points (58%) are the weakest area; consider tightening the self-monitoring routine and adding a midday check-in. Across the caseload, fidelity below 70% is the strongest predictor of stalled progress in this sample — prioritize coaching for Student C's Tier 3 plan. Open the AI Risk Engine for student-level analysis →
👤 Educator decides AI summaries are decision-support only, drafted from fictional sample data and reviewed by the team before any change.
All data shown is realistic fictional sample data created for demonstration. AI is simulated and decision-support only.