Accreditation Readiness Assessment
A reflective diagnostic across eight accreditation areas. Rate each indicator honestly and generate a readiness score, a gap analysis that surfaces your priority areas, recommendations, and an improvement roadmap. Accreditation is continuous improvement — this is a starting point for an honest conversation, not a verdict.
Rate each indicator on a 1–5 scale: 1 = Not in place, 2 = Emerging, 3 = Developing, 4 = Mostly in place, 5 = Fully embedded. Your responses are scored locally and saved privately in this browser. Indicators are illustrative; the diagnostic is configurable to any accreditation model.
🧭 Leadership Capacity
School leaders set a clear direction and hold the organization accountable for results.
Leadership decisions are transparent, consistent, and grounded in the institution's mission.
📚 Teaching Quality
Curriculum is documented, aligned to standards, and consistently taught across classrooms.
Formative assessment is used regularly to adjust instruction to student needs.
🎓 Student Outcomes
Student achievement and growth are monitored against benchmarks and trend over time.
Outcome data are disaggregated by group, and gaps trigger targeted action.
⚖️ Governance
The governing board operates within clear roles and focuses on direction and oversight.
Policies are current, followed, and reviewed on a defined cycle.
🎯 Strategic Planning
A current strategic plan with measurable goals guides budget and calendar decisions.
Progress against plan goals is reviewed regularly and adjustments are documented.
🗂️ Evidence Quality
Evidence is organized, current, and aligned to specific standards and indicators.
Claims in the self-study are supported by artifacts and outcome data, not assertion.
🔄 Continuous Improvement
Improvement cycles (plan → act → monitor → reflect) are embedded in routines.
Changes are made because of evidence, and their impact is monitored and documented.
🤝 Stakeholder Engagement
Families, students, and staff have meaningful, two-way input into improvement.
Results and decisions are communicated, and stakeholders can see how feedback was used.
Scale: 1 = Not in place · 2 = Emerging · 3 = Developing · 4 = Mostly in place · 5 = Fully embedded.