Prepare / Evidence Management
🗂️ Evidence System

Evidence Management

A centralized home for your accreditation evidence — one repository for organizing, version-controlling, tagging, and aligning every artifact to a standard, with a review-and-approval workflow and quality indicators. Track collection progress, see what is complete, and walk artifacts from upload to approval.

Research Foundation

Reviewers weigh evidence quality, not quantity. The strongest evidence is current, aligned to a specific indicator, triangulated across sources, and shows impact. Standards & evidence shown are illustrative; your evidence log is saved privately in this browser.

Evidence Completion

0
Artifacts logged
0
Complete & approved
0%
Collection complete
Evidence completion 0%

Evidence Tracker

Add each artifact, align it to a quality domain, and set its review status. Completion analytics above update automatically. Your log is stored privately in this browser — nothing is uploaded.

Evidence Workflow

Every artifact moves through five stages. Click each step to expand it.

1 · Upload & version controlRepository

Add the artifact to the central repository. Keep a single source of truth: name files consistently, capture the date, and retain prior versions so reviewers see the current document and its history.

2 · Tag & organizeMetadata

Apply tags — domain, year, owner, source type — so any artifact is findable. Good metadata is what turns a folder of files into an evidence system.

3 · Align to a standardAlignment

Map the artifact to the specific standard and indicator it supports. One strong artifact may evidence several indicators; note each alignment explicitly. See the standards library.

4 · Review for qualityWorkflow

A reviewer checks the artifact against the quality indicators: is it current, relevant, triangulated, and does it show impact? Weak or dated evidence is flagged for replacement.

5 · Approve & finalizeApproval

An approver marks the artifact complete and ready for the self-study. Approved evidence counts toward your completion analytics above.

Evidence Quality Indicators

Strong evidence is current (reflects present practice), aligned (maps to a named indicator), triangulated (corroborated across sources), and impact-bearing (shows a result, not just an activity). When you log artifacts above, set status to Complete only once an artifact meets these tests. All examples are illustrative.